fengniao.com. All rights reserved . 北京蜂鸟映像电子商务有限公司(蜂鸟网 FENGNIAO.COM)版权所有
京ICP证 150110号 京ICP备 15000193号-2
违法和未成年人不良信息举报电话: 13001052615
举报邮箱: fengniao@fengniao.com
学习到不少
谢谢分享
这两个镜头都用过一阶段。现在用的是24-70。个人感觉,这两个头各有优缺,要看个人的需要而选择。
24-70的个体差异据说是很大的,搞摄影器材的人应该都知道。我也不知道用的是好的还是不好的。photozone上说,四个才碰到一个好的。^_^
关于这两个镜头的讨论,网上有很多帖子。楼主不妨多搜搜。
个人感觉,24-105的锐度要高,而且轻便很多,而且还有IS,是喜欢旅游和准备一机一境的朋友的选择。24-70,要重很多,大不少,而且锐度没24-105好。就是F2.8在吸引着用户。F2.8是个很重要的选择。如果您对F2.8不在意,而且不打算进70-200的镜头了。24-105是最好的选择,再配个大光圈的定焦,绝对是好选择。 如果需要70-200的镜头,需要F2.8,不嫌重,那就24-70吧。
推荐个配置。24-105+100-400,这个应该是个挺好的组合。如果不喜欢打鸟。24-105+200/2.8,也是个挺好的选择。
个人是喜欢新闻摄影,所以,需要有个70-200,所以就配24-70了。按自己的需要,请楼主选择。
个人愚见,仅供参考。
好久没见仁兄了。^_^ 工作很忙吧。很少见到您的帖子了。
关于24-70/2.8,个人实在不敢恭维。可能也是受photozone.de上评测的影响,而且在一位卖器材的朋友聊天的时候,他也提到,Canon的24-70的个体差异太大。有一些不错,有一些根本谈不上好。
前一阶段刚想换成35/1.4L,后来考虑到方便性,还是留下了。如果对画质要求高,又喜欢创造的朋友,建议还是上大光圈的定焦。绝对比24-70强很多。^_^
这个话题网上有很多讨论,以前曾经查过。
推荐楼主可以参考:
www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/
www.photozone.de
www.the-digital-picture.com
个人感觉还是24 70 占点优势,如果对2.8没什么偏爱 24 105是不二的选择。
为什么会这样呢?是涉及上造成的吗?
photozone 上测试所有镜头可能都是在350D上吧。对24-70和24-105的评测都是在350D上。感觉只是对24-70颇有微词。^_^
为了节省各位时间。把部分内容转载过来。
------------------------------
24-105
Regarding its equivalent zoom range (39-168mm) on an APS-C DSLR the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 USM L IS may not be the most sexy lens here but its performance figures are very impressive nonetheless. In fact the resolution results beat those from the EF 24-70mm f/2.8 USM L and match the EF 28-70mm f/2.8 USM L with its much more conservative zoom range (but higher speed). There's a slight decrease in performance at 105mm but even here the quality remains on a very high level. As to be expected from a modern Canon L lens the construction quality is up to pro standards matching its fasters cousins. The lower price tag plus the extra IS should compensate the slightly more moderate max. aperture for most users. Is it a perfect lens then ? Well, there're also downsides like pronounced barrel distortions and higher than expected CAs at the wide-end of the zoom range. However, the package remains extremely attractive if you can live with the rather unattractive zoom range on an APS-C DSLR - similar to other 28-xx or 24-xx zooms this lens is really more meant for 1.3x or FF (D)SLRs.
24-70
The Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 USM L proved to be a worthy representative of the pro grade lens league ... if you can get a good sample. During the last two years four lenses has seen the lab with only one within specs - this is disappointing especially for a lens of this price class. If you´re lucky enough to get a decent sample you can expect a very high performance level, especially when stopped down a bit. Distortions, vignetting and CAs are well controlled. The build quality is superb with only the reverse zoom extension as a minor downside. Even so the 24-70mm range is not all that attractive on APS-C DSLRs (39-112mm) - the EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 USM IS is a better and cheaper bet except regarding build quality.
http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/index.html
如果是全画幅机身24-70绝对好,24-70在非全画幅上表现不很好。24-105没用过不知道。
请输入正确的手机号码
请输入正确的验证码
发送验证码