http://www.photozone.de/nikon_ff/578...00vrff?start=2


没画质，没机械性能，没性价比！


Anyone considering a super zoom should be aware of the fact that any such lens is full of compromises to achieve the huge focal range. This is, unfortunately, especially true for the Nikon AF-S 28-300 VR.
Distortion is very pronounced at almost any focal length, vignetting is somewhat on the high side, too, which is also true for CAs. Sharpness in the image center is good, but not great, especially towards the long end, and border and corners can be very soft at many focal length and aperture settings. So, optically, the lens does not really convince.

Mechanically however, there's not much to complain about. The build quality is ok and in line with other consumer grade Nikkor lenses. VR II works as promised and AF, although a bit slow, works almost silently.

So, in the end its a matter of balancing whether the convenience factor of such a lens outweighs its shortcomings. For many it might, but anyone shooting both sensor sizes will probably be better off with the 18-200 VR II on his or her DX camera.

你又不买，操什么心。

就算是垃圾，与你何干？？

LZ的英语水平明显不行啊，先看懂了再说吧，目前的英语水平不应轻易涉猎英文评测~

出来贻笑大方~

看看无忌上老孙发的大片，比看任何评测都有说服力。

QD？？？

还是有人把你认出来啦。

它在我点测联动那片帖子里喷 粪的时候，我就觉得奇怪

这是那篇帖子，可以看看它的素质~
http://bbs.fengniao.com/forum/2108148_4.html

后来它又发了一个很搞笑的帖子，无理搅三分：
http://bbs.fengniao.com/forum/2108615.html



了解了他的真面目，才能更客观的理解他发帖的意图~


--

QD?不是吧？
这么晚不睡？

画质是比较差！基本是很差了，机械结构还是合格的！