-
不错
2016-05-30 回复 -
仅从MTF曲线图上的数据来看，腾龙＞佳能＞大法，但原厂优势就是逼格高而且滤镜便宜。 从14mm到800mm全视角参考图：http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/lens/simulator/#DX （来自尼康官网） 以后准备买镜头纠结焦段又不好对比的人可以看这个作为参考。
2016-05-28 回复 -
腾龙的光圈大有优势
2015-11-07 回复 -
这不还是没有结果啊
2015-09-11 回复 -
纠结过这俩头，最后选佳能的了。
2015-07-26 回复 -
一个是16，一个15。视角肯定不一样啦
2015-07-26 回复 -
腾龙确实整体黄一些
2015-07-22 回复 -
很好，有了初步的印象。 希望楼主再多拍些比较，最好同焦段的三脚架下的比较。谢谢!
2015-07-22 回复 -
有点区别
2015-03-10 回复 -
星芒比16 35 f4的要好，不知道跟16 35 f2.8二代比如何。。 原文上一段结尾清楚地表明1530的星芒没有佳能的干净和锐利 结尾明白无误地说了星芒是佳能1635/4L的最好 http://www.dpreview.com/articles/4651324149/tamron-15-30-f2-8-vs-nikon-14-24-f2-8-shootout/2 For this particular scene, the Tamron, Nikon, and Canon started creating sharp sunstars at F11, F16, and F8 respectively, meaning it was easiest to create a sharp burst on the Canon, and most difficult on the Nikon (bursts get sharper as you stop down further). The Nikon has a very distinctive, 36-ray rendition, since each ray splits in two. The Tamron is more like the Canon in this regard, but its rays aren't quite as sharp, diffusing a bit as they travel radially outward. Ultimately this boils down to a matter of taste, but I'm going to hand it to the Canon for making the sharpest, most pleasing sunbursts. In fact, all of Canon's latest L-series zooms perform well in this regard with their newly designed 9-blade apertures.
2015-03-10 回复
分享到朋友圈
0打开微信，点击底部的“发现”，使用
“扫一扫”即可将网页分享至朋友圈。